Novel 30-amp MOSES versus MOSES 2.0 pulse-modulation technologies for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP)

Bibliographic Information
Authors: Elmansy H.; Mousa A.; Hodhod A.; Abdul Hadi R.; Nour H.; Alharbi M.; Berjaoui M.B.; Tayebi S.-L.; Morgan M.; Gonzalez R.R.; Zakaria A.S.
Journal: World Journal of Urology
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
Publication Date: 22 June 2026
Volume / Issue: Volume 44 / Issue 1
Article No.: 449
ISSN: 7244983
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-026-06530-x
Scopus: View on Scopus
PubMed: 42329295
Document Type: Article
Authors and Affiliations
Elmansy H., Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States; Mousa A., Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Giza, Egypt; Hodhod A., King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Abdul Hadi R., Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada; Nour H., Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Giza, Egypt; Alharbi M., Qassim University, Qassim, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia; Berjaoui M.B., University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Tayebi S.-L., Western University, London, ON, Canada; Morgan M., Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States; Gonzalez R.R., Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States; Zakaria A.S., Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to compare early perioperative and functional outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) performed with the 30-amp MOSES system and MOSES 2.0 technology. Methods: We retrospectively compared 65 patients who underwent HoLEP with the 30-amp MOSES system and 210 with MOSES 2.0 between June 2023 and April 2025.Intraoperative and perioperative outcomes were collected and analyzed at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Results: The two groups had comparable preoperative characteristics, with median prostate volumes of 105 and 111 cc in the MOSES 2.0 and 30-amp MOSES groups, respectively (p = 0.22). Intraoperatively, the MOSES 2.0 group demonstrated an 8-minute shorter median enucleation time (p = 0.007), a 3-minute shorter median hemostasis time (p < 0.001), and lower energy use (75.7 vs. 92.1 kJ, p < 0.001). Additionally, MOSES 2.0 demonstrated superior enucleation efficiency compared to 30-amp MOSES (2.2 vs. 2 g/min, p = 0.047). Other operative parameters were comparable between the two groups. Both technologies achieved comparable successful same-day trial of void rates of 94% in the MOSES 2.0 group and 93.4% in the 30-amp MOSES group (p = 0.88). Postoperative functional outcomes, including IPSS, QoL, Qmax, PVR, and PSA, were comparable between groups up to 6 months of follow-up. Conclusion: HoLEP with 30-amp MOSES technology is a safe and effective option for treating benign prostatic obstruction. Both MOSES systems support same-day discharge with comparable safety and functional outcomes. The 30-amp MOSES system may offer a practical alternative for institutions without a dedicated 50-amp power supply. Large randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up are warranted. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2026.
Keywords
Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Laser prostate surgery; MOSES technology; Prostate; Aged; Humans; Laser Therapy; Lasers, Solid-State; Male; Middle Aged; Prostatectomy; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; comparative study; devices; drug therapy; human; procedures; prostate hypertrophy; retrospective study; solid state laser; surgery
Citation Information
Scopus Citations: 0
For comprehensive information about the Theodor Bilharz Research Institute (TBRI), its institutional activities, scientific and research achievements, clinical and hospital services, and the diverse expertise offered through its 22 specialized research and clinical departments, as well as opportunities for professional training, specialized workshops, and scientific conferences, readers are invited to visit the Institute’s official website.
The website provides regularly updated information on the Institute’s latest news, research activities, scientific initiatives, clinical services, institutional programs, and academic and professional opportunities.
English Website: https://www.tbri.sci.eg/en/
Arabic Website: https://www.tbri.sci.eg/ar/
Prepared and Uploaded by:
Abdalla F. Abdalla
Electronic Portal Unit
