Bougie assisted endotracheal intubation using the Air-Q™ Intubating Laryngeal Airway: A prospective randomized clinical study

Bibliographic Information
Authors: Ebied R.S.; Ali M.Z.; Khafagy H.F.; Samhan Y.M.
Journal: Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Publisher: Central Society of Egyptian Anaesthesiologists
Publication Date: 17 May 2019
Volume / Issue: Volume 33 / Issue 1
Pages: 107–112
ISSN: 11101849
DOI: 10.1016/j.egja.2016.10.004
Scopus: View on Scopus
Document Type: Article
Access: All Open Access; Hybrid Gold Open Access
Authors and Affiliations
Ebied R.S., Department of Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Management, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Ministry of High Education & Scientific Research, Giza, Egypt; Ali M.Z., Department of Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Management, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Ministry of High Education & Scientific Research, Giza, Egypt; Khafagy H.F., Department of Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Management, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Ministry of High Education & Scientific Research, Giza, Egypt; Samhan Y.M., Department of Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care and Pain Management, Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Ministry of High Education & Scientific Research, Giza, Egypt
Abstract
Background Air-Q™ Intubating Laryngeal Airway is an extraglottic airway device used as a primary airway tool or as an adjunct to tracheal intubation. The bougie is a simple flexible device that might increase the success rate of endotracheal intubation either blindly or through a supraglottic device. We hypothesized that using bougie guided intubation through air-Q™ can improve the success rate with minimal complications. Methods One hundred and forty patients of either sex, >18 years old, ASA I-II scheduled for elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia with intubation were randomly allocated to one of two groups of 70 patients each. Blind tracheal intubation was performed through air-Q™ with bougie assistance (Group B) or without (Group Q). In both groups, 3 attempts were allowed for successful device insertion. After obtaining normal capnographic wave, 3 more attempts were tried for intubation with or without bougie guidance. Lung ventilation through air-Q™ was permitted between intubation attempts. If tracheal intubation through air-Q™ was unsuccessful, it was performed by direct laryngoscopy. Results Air-Q™ time, ease, attempts number of insertion and ventilation grade were comparable between both groups. Total intubation time was significantly longer in group-B (P = 0.001) while overall success rate for intubation was comparable (64.3%). Group-B showed significant (P = 0.001) higher incidence of complications (trauma (P = 0.023), sore throat (P = 0.001), dysphonia (P = 0.023) and dysphagia (P = 0.001)) as compared with group-Q. In spite of significant decrease in both heart rate and mean arterial pressure in both groups after air-Q™ insertion, yet there was significant increase in both parameters after intubation compared to baseline values (P < 0.05) which was more prominent in group-B than in group-Q. Significant increase in HR and MAP was elicited after bougie placement in group-B (P < 0.01). Conclusion Bougie guided tracheal intubation through air-Q™ didn't improve overall success rate with significant longer time, hemodynamic derangement and traumatic sequelae. © 2016
Keywords
Air-Q; Bougie assisted; Intubation; adult; Article; bougie; breathing circuit; capnometry; comparative study; controlled study; dysphagia; dysphonia; elective surgery; endotracheal intubation; endotracheal tube; esophagus intubation; female; general anesthesia; heart rate; human; hypoxia; incidence; laryngeal mask; laryngoscopy; lip disease; lung ventilation; major clinical study; male; mean arterial pressure; medical device complication; mouth injury; prospective study; randomized controlled trial; sore throat; surgical patient; tongue disease; treatment outcome
Citation Information
Scopus Citations: 4
For comprehensive information about the Theodor Bilharz Research Institute (TBRI), its institutional activities, scientific and research achievements, clinical and hospital services, and the diverse expertise offered through its 22 specialized research and clinical departments, as well as opportunities for professional training, specialized workshops, and scientific conferences, readers are invited to visit the Institute’s official website.
The website provides regularly updated information on the Institute’s latest news, research activities, scientific initiatives, clinical services, institutional programs, and academic and professional opportunities.
English Website: https://www.tbri.sci.eg/en/
Arabic Website: https://www.tbri.sci.eg/ar/
Prepared and Uploaded by:
Abdalla F. Abdalla
Electronic Portal Unit
