Patient and surgeon predictors of achieving the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study

Theodor Bilharz Research Institute

Bibliographic Information

Authors: Addasi R.; Al-Sabe’ L.; AlRawabdeh K.; Abu-Zayed R.; Alaarag A.; Ribeiro M.A.F., Jr; Helmy A.H.; El Muhtaseb M.S.; Daradkeh S.

Journal: Frontiers in Surgery

Publisher: Frontiers Media SA

Publication Date: 25 September 2025

Volume / Issue: Volume 12

Article No.: 1661510

ISSN: 2296875X

DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1661510

Scopus: View on Scopus

Document Type: Article

Access: All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access


Authors and Affiliations

Addasi R., Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Al-Sabe’ L., Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; AlRawabdeh K., School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Abu-Zayed R., Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Alaarag A., HCA Florida Healthcare, USF Morsani College of Medicine, Citrus Hospital, Inverness, FL, United States; Ribeiro M.A.F., Jr, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland—R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, MD, United States; Helmy A.H., Department of General Surgery, Theodor Bilharze Research Institute, Giza, Egypt; El Muhtaseb M.S., Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Daradkeh S., Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan


Abstract

Introduction: The Critical View of Safety (CVS) is a cornerstone of safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), aimed at minimizing the risk of bile duct injury (BDI). However, consistent achievement of CVS remains a challenge in surgical practice. The primary outcome of this study was to assess the rate of CVS achievement and to identify patient, disease and surgeon related predictors. Methods: A prospective cohort of 150 patients undergoing LC was analyzed. Demographic data, preoperative risk factors, intraoperative variables, and surgeon characteristics were examined. CVS assessment was performed using Strasberg's criteria. Binary logistic regression and Chi-squared test were used to identify independent predictors of CVS achievement. Results: The rate of CVS achievement in this study was 69.6% among consultants and 60.0% among residents. Logistic regression identified ASA grade I (p = 0.031), emergency surgery (p = 0.01), acute cholecystitis (p = 0.031), and non-HPB surgeons (p < 0.001) were associated with higher rate of CVS achievement. The higher rate of CVS achievement among non-HPB surgeons may reflect differences in case complexity, documentation practices & stricter adherence to protocols. Other factors including level of surgeon experience, Tokyo severity grade, intraoperative Nassar difficulty grading scale, age, male gender, BMI, diabetes mellitus and clinical frailty score were not significant. There were zero cases of bile duct injury in this study, precluding analysis of CVS failure impact on BDI. Conclusion: Both preoperative and intraoperative factors can influence a surgeon's ability to achieve CVS. In our study, lower ASA grade, emergency cholecystectomies, acute cholecystitis and operations performed by non-HPB surgeons were associated with a higher likelihood of achieving CVS. Standardized protocols and structured training may help improve CVS documentation across practice settings. 2025 Addasi, Al-Sabe’, AlRawabdeh, Abu-Zayed, Alaarag, Ribeiro, Helmy, El Muhtaseb and Daradkeh.


Keywords

acute cholecystitis; bile duct injury; Calot's triangle; critical view of safety; intraoperative cholangiography; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Nassar difficulty grading scale; Tokyo guidelines


Citation Information

Scopus Citations: 2


For comprehensive information about the Theodor Bilharz Research Institute (TBRI), its institutional activities, scientific and research achievements, clinical and hospital services, and the diverse expertise offered through its 22 specialized research and clinical departments, as well as opportunities for professional training, specialized workshops, and scientific conferences, readers are invited to visit the Institute’s official website.

The website provides regularly updated information on the Institute’s latest news, research activities, scientific initiatives, clinical services, institutional programs, and academic and professional opportunities.

English Website: https://www.tbri.sci.eg/en/

Arabic Website: https://www.tbri.sci.eg/ar/

Prepared and Uploaded by:

Abdalla F. Abdalla

Electronic Portal Unit

Electronic Portal Unit

Popular Posts

A cost-performance index for nano-optical biosensor evaluation: Systematic evaluation of europium–salicylate luminescent platforms for GPC3-targeted early HCC diagnosis

Interpretation of liver stiffness measurement in patients with mixed liver disease etiologies

Holothuria arenicola Extract-Loaded Polycaprolactone Nanocapsules Attenuate Bile Duct Ligation-Induced Acute Liver Injury

Mytilus edulis-mediated green synthesis of selenium nanoparticles with antimicrobial and molluscicidal applications

Microbial levan potentiates hepatic retention and antitumor activity of a PEGylated benzimidazole–curcumin nanocomplex through TLR2–FXR/FGF15-associated immunometabolic remodeling in experimental liver cancer

Variable clinical presentations of pulmonary hydatid cysts: a four-case series from a single center in United Arab Emirates, non-endemic region

Corrigendum to ‘Eco-friendly approach for the removal and simultaneous detection of cyanide toxins from drinking and wastewater sources’ [Environ. Pollut. 385 (2025) 127094]